Sunday, February 12, 2012

Definition of safe motion

Safe drive functions have recently made their mark on standards, products and applications and today can be considered as state of the art. They are part of the functional safety of plant and machinery and, as measures that boost productivity, are increasingly gaining ground in the market. The protection of machinery and equipment is also increasing in importance alongside personal protection.

When you examine the application of the failsafe principle within classic safety functions, initiation of the safety function causes the outputs to shut down, and this is called a “safe condition”. If safe drive functions are used, an application may look like this: When a safety gate is opened, the motor is braked safely with a defined ramp and then remains at standstill under active control. The motor will then move in jog mode at safely reduced speed. In other words: if static detection zone monitoring has been violated, production can continue at a reduced number of cycles and with safely monitored movements.

What this simple example illustrates is the transition from static to dynamic safety. Dynamic means something different in the various disciplines. In safety technology, dynamic is understood to be the ability to adapt the safety functions to the changing detection zones. The functional safety requirements for variable speed drives specified in EN/IEC 61800-5-2 open up new horizons on this issue.

The main requirements of safe drive systems in terms of dynamic safety are:
  • Safe monitoring of kinematic variables such as acceleration, speed, distance, for example
  • Short reaction times to reduce stopping distances
  • Variable limit values, which can be adapted to suit the runtime
Drive-integrated safety technology, fast, safe drive buses, high-performance programmable safety systems and safe camera systems are all products suitable for high-end safety solutions. The term “safe motion” is interpreted differently, depending on your perspective. Drive manufacturers generally understand safe motion to be drive-integrated safety, whereas control manufacturers associate it with external solutions. Looking at the issue analytically we can establish that the term “safe motion” only refers in the first instance to the implementation of a safe movement.

No comments:

Post a Comment